Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process

 

IJSA applies a rigorous and transparent double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality, originality, and scientific contribution of all submitted manuscripts.

Double-Blind Review

Author and reviewer identities are concealed to ensure unbiased evaluation.

Minimum Two Reviewers

Each manuscript is evaluated by at least two independent reviewers.

Editorial Screening

Initial screening ensures scope relevance, formatting, and plagiarism check.

Peer Review Workflow

Illustration of IJSA peer review and publication workflow.

Process Overview

  1. Submission: Manuscript submitted via OJS.
  2. Initial Screening: Scope check and plagiarism screening.
  3. Reviewer Assignment: Experts selected by editor.
  4. Peer Review: Double-blind evaluation.
  5. Editorial Decision: Based on reviewer reports.
  6. Revision: Author revises and resubmits.
  7. Final Decision: Accepted papers proceed to publication.
Accept
Minor Revision
Major Revision
Resubmit
Reject

Ethical Standards

  • All manuscripts are screened for plagiarism.
  • Double-blind confidentiality is strictly maintained.
  • Conflicts of interest must be disclosed.
  • IJSA follows ethical publishing best practices.